Infidelity: what happens next and how trust is rebuilt

What repair actually asks of each of you.

I will help the 2 of you take this in an order that holds.

Table of contents
TherapyCPH logo

See more TherapyCPH articles on Google.

At a glance

Infidelity breaks an agreement about exclusivity, and what follows has an order to it. You want the truth and you want it to stop hurting, and in the early weeks hearing more of the truth makes it hurt more. This article sets out what repair asks of each of you, and what nobody can tell you yet.

Clinical insights from 22 years in psychotherapy

I’m Mark Colclough, MA, psychotherapist in Copenhagen. Qualified at the Psychosynthesis Education Trust and the University of East London. 22 years of full-time, face-to-face clinical practice.

  • Responsibility matters more than calm. The couples who get somewhere are rarely the composed ones in the first session, and I stopped reading early distress as a bad sign a long time ago.
  • The denial is its own injury. Clients return to the months of being told that nothing was happening more than they return to the affair itself.
  • The decision stays theirs. When a couple ask me to tell them whether to stay together, I hand the question back, because a decision I made for them would not hold.

Clinical notes: My observations are anonymised and compounded from my session notes since 2004.

What counts as infidelity?

Infidelity is whatever breaks the agreement the 2 of you had about exclusivity. Most couples never say that agreement out loud. They inherit it, assume it is shared, and find out at the worst possible moment that each of them had been holding a slightly different version of it.

A physical affair breaks the clearest version of the rule, which is why it is the case people argue about least. An emotional affair breaks a vaguer one: nothing physical happens and the closeness the relationship was supposed to hold has been going somewhere else. Then there is the slow kind, deleted messages and a friendship never mentioned, which does its damage by accumulation rather than in one blow. What weighs heaviest, in what I see, is not the category. It is what was hidden, for how long, and what was said when it was asked about. There is more on emotional affairs and micro-cheating.

How common is infidelity?

Nobody has a trustworthy figure, and I would rather say so than quote one. Every number comes from asking people to admit the thing they lied about, in surveys that define infidelity differently and mostly ask only about sex. What the research establishes is narrower. A history of extramarital sex goes with substantially raised odds of being separated or divorced1, and among people who had divorced, infidelity was the reason reported most commonly, ahead of incompatibility and growing apart2.

Neither of those settles the sequence. Whether the affair ended the marriage or the marriage was already ending is not something a survey can separate, and in the couples I see it runs both ways. What any of it says about your relationship is nothing at all. These are maps of populations, and you are not a data point in one.

What happens in the first days after it comes out?

The first days are closer to shock than to sadness. What people describe is not grief so much as static. Sleep goes first and appetite follows. You are cold, then you cannot sit still. The mind runs the same few facts round and round looking for a version of them that hurts less, finds none, and runs them again.

  • Two separate injuries. One is the affair. The other is the stretch of time in which you were told nothing was going on, and the second takes longer to settle.
  • Doubting your own judgement. You noticed something and were told you were imagining it, so now you distrust your own reading of a period of your own life.
  • Explanations land as excuses. At this stage almost any explanation is heard as one, which is worth knowing before you offer it.

The partner who had the affair frequently feels relief and panic in the same hour, and it is the relief that pushes them into explaining too early.

A single empty chair in a bare room in warm sunlight
Most of the first fortnight is spent sitting with something that will not be hurried.

Should the unfaithful partner tell everything?

Tell all of the facts in one piece, and leave out the graphic detail unless your partner asks for it. The facts are what happened, when, with whom and for how long. A scene-by-scene account leaves images that stay for years and help nobody, and the betrayed partner is the one who decides what more they need, once the first shock has passed.

What does the real damage is truth arriving in instalments. Each new piece restarts the clock, and it teaches your partner that what they get told depends on what they have managed to find out, which is a worse discovery than the affair. The instinct behind it is easy to follow. You tell the version you think the relationship might survive, then add to it under pressure. In my clinical judgement it is the single most destructive thing that happens in this work. If there is more, it goes on the table now, however bad it is.

Why does the betrayed partner keep asking the same question?

Because the question underneath it has not been answered yet. Most people have the facts within a few weeks, in what I see, and they keep asking anyway.

  • What is actually being asked. Did I matter at all, was I being laughed at, and can I trust my own memory of that time.
  • Why a timeline does not help. None of those 3 questions is answered by dates and times, so a precise account leaves the asker no better off.
  • I have already told you that. The sentence is true and it makes things worse, because it answers a request for reassurance as though it were a request for information.
  • The tenth answer counts. Answering the same question steadily for the tenth time is not a failure of the process. It is a large part of the repair.

Were you thinking about me gets further than what time did you leave, and it is much the harder question to ask.

How do you rebuild trust after infidelity?

In an order: the contact ends, responsibility is taken without defence, the injury is understood, and closeness returns last. An unhappy relationship does not cause an affair, because a person decided to have one. The state of the relationship still matters to why it happened, and holding those 2 things at the same time is the difference between understanding something and excusing it. I work mainly with Emotion-Focused Therapy for couples, developed by Leslie Greenberg, which puts the injury itself rather than the argument about it at the centre.

  • End the contact properly. One message, with your partner there if they want to be, and where contact has to continue for work or children it is minimal, practical and visible.
  • Hold the big decision. Agree that nothing permanent is settled in the first weeks, which protects both of you and not only the one who wants to stay.
  • Contain the conversation. Talk about it at a set time, for a set length, and not at midnight. That is a suggestion that works for most couples I see, not a rule.
  • Keep the 2 questions apart. Why the affair happened and what the relationship had been like are separate enquiries, and merging them turns the conversation into a trial.
  • The timetable belongs to your partner. Guilt is private and asks nothing of anybody, where repair is external and slow, and the pace is not set by the person who wants it over.

There is some research on couples who came through it. Among 16 couples who stayed together after sexual infidelity and described real healing, the path ran through 4 stages: the revelation, the first reactions, stabilising the relationship, and only then bringing the relationship back to life3. All of them had already succeeded, so that describes a route and not the chance of taking it.

Some couples come through this and others separate, and anybody who tells you in the first month which one you are is guessing. What I cannot tell you is whether the wish to stay that you feel this week is love or dread. That becomes clearer with time rather than with more information, and it is worth not deciding while it is still unclear. Separating is a decision in its own right and deserves the same care as staying. There is more on affair recovery and on divorce therapy.

This ordering is not enough when the 2 of you cannot get through one conversation without it ending badly, when the contact has not actually stopped, or when new facts keep appearing months in. It is the wrong frame altogether where one of you is being frightened or controlled rather than hurt, which needs its own help first. Otherwise a session or the free 30-minute call is where this conversation can start.

Questions people ask

Should the 2 of us come together, or should I come on my own?

Together, where you both want to find out whether the relationship survives this, and on your own where you need to work out what you want before you negotiate it. Plenty of people start alone and bring their partner in later.

How soon after it comes out is it worth starting therapy?

Earlier than most couples think, because the first weeks are when the avoidable damage gets done. The early sessions are less about understanding why and more about holding the situation steady enough to think in.

Will a therapist expect me to forgive, or to stay?

No, and a therapist working towards a particular outcome has put their thumb on the scale. My job is to make the choice a real one rather than to steer it.

What happens in a first session after an affair?

I ask what each of you knows, what has been asked and answered so far, and whether the contact has ended. Then I suggest some structure for how the subject gets discussed at home.

How do I choose a therapist for this?

Look for somebody who works with couples and affairs routinely and who will not take a side. A free 30-minute call is enough to hear whether a therapist can hold 2 accounts at once without ruling on either.

Sources

  1. Allen, E. S. and Atkins, D. C., The Association of Divorce and Extramarital Sex in a Representative U.S. Sample, Journal of Family Issues, 2012
  2. Amato, P. R. and Previti, D., People’s Reasons for Divorcing: Gender, Social Class, the Life Course, and Adjustment, Journal of Family Issues, 2003
  3. Fife, S. T., Gossner, J. D., Theobald, A., Allen, E., Rivero, A. and Koehl, H., Couple Healing from Infidelity: A Grounded Theory Study, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2023

How this article was written: I choose the subject and the angle. An AI assistant researches and drafts. I read the draft, correct and improve it and stand behind every clinical statement. The professional and clinical judgement is mine.

Table of contents

Need support?

I’m Mark Colclough, MA, a psychotherapist and EFT couples therapist specialising in expats and international couples. If something here is close to what you are living with, a first conversation is free and there is no obligation.

Masterclasses for couples

Three sessions on one agreed focus, with a free onboarding call first.

TherapyCPH logo

See more TherapyCPH articles on Google.

You might also like

Picture of Mark Colclough

Mark Colclough

MA-qualified psychotherapist and couples therapist in central Copenhagen, practising since 2004. Advanced training in emotion-focused couples therapy and attachment theory. Works in English and Danish.

If any of this sounds familiar

You do not have to work it out on your own first. Bring it as it is, and we will look at it together.

Join the newsletter community

Join the newsletter and receive five practical tips for nurturing healthy relationships — with yourself and the people around you.

No spam. Just mindful insights.

Request a call

Please fill out this information and I’ll contact you soon. I use your details to reply to your enquiry, talk through practicalities and, if you wish, book a session. Please do not write sensitive information in the message field.

Clicking the button adds your email address to my mailing list. Please read the Privacy Policy for more information.

P.S. I’ll call you in a bit!