ADHD and relationships: why you argue and how to stop

Why the arguments repeat, and what actually ends them

I will show you what is driving the argument, and what stops it.

Table of contents
TherapyCPH logo

See more TherapyCPH articles on Google.

At a glance

ADHD changes the pace and the pitch of an argument more than it changes the subject. What gets forgotten, interrupted or said at speed does the damage, and an apology afterwards rarely undoes it. This article shows you what drives the row and what has to change in the arrangement between you.

Clinical insights from 22 years in psychotherapy

I’m Mark Colclough, MA, psychotherapist in Copenhagen. Qualified at the Psychosynthesis Education Trust and the University of East London. 22 years of full-time, face-to-face clinical practice.

  • The row is about the aftermath. Couples arrive arguing about a forgotten errand and are in fact arguing about what the forgetting is taken to mean.
  • The two of you finish at different times. In my clients the partner with ADHD has finished the argument internally while the other one is still standing inside it.
  • Both roles harden. One takes on the reminding and the checking, the other takes on the apologising, and neither likes who they have become inside it.

Clinical notes: My observations are anonymised and compounded from my session notes since 2004.

Why does ADHD make us argue?

ADHD runs the same argument at a different speed and temperature for each of you, so you are rarely in the same conversation at the same time.

  • Interruption reads as dismissal. Finishing your sentence is impulse. It arrives as not caring what you were going to say.
  • Forgetting reads as ranking. The thing not done becomes evidence about where you come on the list.
  • Heat arrives early. The row is at full volume before either of you has said what it is about.
  • The ending is uneven. One of you is done in 10 minutes. The other needs the rest of the day.

Adults with ADHD divorce more, report less satisfaction with their relationships, and have more hostile conflict and poorer conflict resolution1. That summary comes from a review of other reviews, and its relationship findings rest on a single source, so read it as a description of a population rather than a forecast for the two of you.

What are we actually arguing about?

Under the practical complaint sits a question about whether you matter to the other person, and neither of you will put it that way out loud.

The bin is the subject. Being the only one who ever notices the bin is the argument. What you feel first is not irritation about rubbish; it is the drop that comes with being unimportant here. Your jaw sets, your voice goes flat and you hear yourself getting shorter, all of it before you have worked out why. The thought you arrive at last is the one that does the lasting harm: that this is roughly what you are worth in this house.

Then watch what happens around the reminder. You hold back from mentioning the appointment, because you would rather be a partner than a supervisor, and you mention it anyway, because the alternative is that it gets missed and you carry the consequence. Your partner asks you to remind them and flinches when you do. The reminder keeps the week running and confirms the thing they least want to be, so the asking and the resenting sit inside the same breath. Nobody has to be insincere for that to happen.

Why does it get so hot so fast?

The feeling arrives at full size before the thinking has caught up with it, and difficulty regulating emotion is a well-documented part of adult ADHD.

  • From flat to furious in one sentence. The reaction fits the feeling. The feeling is larger than the event that set it off.
  • Fast down as well as fast up. The storm clears for one of you long before it clears for the other.
  • Shame underneath the anger. Being told again about something forgotten lands on top of every other time it has been said.

Adults with ADHD show markedly more emotion dysregulation than comparison groups, and emotional lability is the largest part of it2. The studies behind that finding vary a great deal among themselves and the authors flagged possible publication bias, so I hold the size of the difference loosely and take its direction seriously. What it changes in the room is the order of work: the volume first, the content second. A point well made at that temperature still does not arrive.

What does this do to the partner who holds the diary?

The partner without ADHD ends up carrying the planning, the remembering and the chasing, and gets no acknowledgement for any of it.

  • Resentment that comes out as nagging. 3 years of reminders arrive in one tone of voice.
  • Nothing left spontaneous. Everything gets managed, so very little gets enjoyed.
  • Guilt about the resentment. You know the forgetting is not aimed at you, and you are furious anyway.
  • A parent role nobody chose. The imbalance takes the desire out of it in both directions.

The load does not sit evenly here, and saying otherwise would be dishonest. One of you is doing more of the organising and the other is doing more of the apologising, and those are not the same weight. For international couples in Copenhagen the organising lands on whichever of you reads Danish well enough to handle the housing, the tax and the school, which has nothing to do with attention and everything to do with circumstance. Separate that source of imbalance from the ADHD one before you argue about either, because the remedies are different.

How do we stop arguing about ADHD?

You stop by changing the arrangement that produces the argument rather than by trying to change the person who forgets.

  • Put it outside both your heads. One shared list that both of you can see ends the argument about who said what to whom.
  • Agree the pause before you need it. 20 minutes out, agreed while calm, is a plan. Walking out mid-row is something else entirely.
  • Separate the task from the meaning. Sort the bin. Then, separately, say what the bin meant.
  • Repair on the same day. A short specific repair does more than a long apology a week later.
  • Divide by capacity rather than into halves. Give each job to whoever can hold it, and stop keeping score of the split.
  • Give the new arrangement time before judging it. Around 6 weeks is a suggestion drawn from my practice and not an established threshold.

These steps assume two people who both accept that the pattern belongs to the pair of them. They are the wrong first move where every conversation returns to whose fault it is, where the reminding has curdled into contempt, where one of you is frightened of the other, or where one of you has stopped trying because the trying was never once noticed. At that point the arrangement is holding itself in place and neither of you is standing anywhere you could change it from. Emotion-Focused Therapy for couples, in Greenberg’s form of it, is built for this, slowing the sequence down to the moment before the heat arrives so that each of you sees what the other is defending. Whether that is available to you depends on things I would want to look at rather than assume. Couples therapy in Copenhagen is where I do that work with both of you in the room, and either of you is welcome to start with the free 30-minute call.

Questions people ask

Should both of us come, or only the partner with ADHD?

Both of you, because the pattern that needs to change sits between you rather than inside one of you. I will sometimes see each of you alone for a session early on, and then bring it back to the pair.

What happens in a first session if we end up arguing in front of you?

That is useful rather than a problem, because it lets me see the actual sequence instead of two accounts of it. I will slow it down at the point where it tips, which is earlier than either of you thinks.

Do we need a formal diagnosis before starting couples therapy?

No, and I do not assess or diagnose. We work with how attention, memory and heat behave between the two of you, whether or not either of you carries a formal label.

Is couples therapy or individual therapy the better place to start?

Couples therapy fits when the arguing is the problem, and individual therapy fits when shame, anger or exhaustion in one of you has become the larger difficulty. Sometimes the honest answer is both, in that order.

What would tell us that the therapy is working?

The arguments get shorter and the repair starts sooner, well before anyone is forgetting less. I would not put a date on that, and I would rather we noticed it together than aimed at a target.

Sources

  1. French, Nalbant, Wright, Sayal, Daley, Groom, Cassidy and Hall, The impacts associated with having ADHD: an umbrella review, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2024
  2. Beheshti, Chavanon and Christiansen, Emotion dysregulation in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis, BMC Psychiatry, 2020

How this article was written: I choose the subject and the angle. An AI assistant researches and drafts. I read the draft, correct and improve it and stand behind every clinical statement. The professional and clinical judgement is mine.

Table of contents

Need support?

I’m Mark Colclough, MA, a psychotherapist and EFT couples therapist specialising in expats and international couples. If something here is close to what you are living with, a first conversation is free and there is no obligation.

Masterclasses for couples

Three sessions on one agreed focus, with a free onboarding call first.

TherapyCPH logo

See more TherapyCPH articles on Google.

You might also like

Picture of Mark Colclough

Mark Colclough

MA-qualified psychotherapist and couples therapist in central Copenhagen, practising since 2004. Advanced training in emotion-focused couples therapy and attachment theory. Works in English and Danish.

If any of this sounds familiar

You do not have to work it out on your own first. Bring it as it is, and we will look at it together.

Join the newsletter community

Join the newsletter and receive five practical tips for nurturing healthy relationships — with yourself and the people around you.

No spam. Just mindful insights.

Request a call

Please fill out this information and I’ll contact you soon. I use your details to reply to your enquiry, talk through practicalities and, if you wish, book a session. Please do not write sensitive information in the message field.

Clicking the button adds your email address to my mailing list. Please read the Privacy Policy for more information.

P.S. I’ll call you in a bit!