At a glance
Most people arrive at a first session wanting to be understood and dreading having to explain themselves. You do not need an account of your life ready, or a diagnosis, or a tidy reason for coming. This describes what a first hour is actually like and how to tell whether to come back.
Clinical insights from 22 years in psychotherapy
I’m Mark Colclough, MA, psychotherapist in Copenhagen. Qualified at the Psychosynthesis Education Trust and the University of East London. 22 years of full-time, face-to-face clinical practice.
- The rehearsed version rarely survives the first 10 minutes. Clients often arrive with an ordered account and find that something quite different comes out once someone is actually listening.
- Not knowing where to start is a usable starting point. When clients say they do not know what the problem is, that difficulty is itself worth following rather than clearing out of the way.
- Relief and exposure often arrive together. Clients frequently leave a first session lighter and slightly raw, and both of those belong to having said something out loud for the first time.
Clinical notes: My observations are anonymised and compounded from my session notes since 2004.
What will I actually be asked?
Less than you fear, and about now rather than about everything. A first session usually begins with what brought you at this point, not at some point in the past 10 years, and the shape of the hour follows your answer rather than a form.
You will not be asked to produce your history in order. I will want to understand what is happening in your life at the moment, what it is doing to you, and what you were hoping might be different. History comes in where it explains something present, and often that is later rather than in the first hour. Practical matters take a few minutes at the start or end: how I work, how often, confidentiality and its limits.
If you came to Copenhagen from elsewhere, you may also be weighing something extra. Whether to explain the move, the language, the distance from family, or whether those are beside the point. Bring them. In this city they are very often part of the difficulty rather than background to it.
What if I can’t explain what is wrong?
Then that is what you say, and the hour starts there. A great many people book because something is off rather than because they can name it, and waiting until you can describe it properly usually means waiting a long time.
Vagueness is information. When you cannot say what is wrong, it is often because naming it would make it real, or because the feeling does not have language yet, or because you have been managing it for so long that it has stopped looking like a problem and started looking like your personality. Each of those leads somewhere, and none of them requires you to arrive fluent.
What helps more than preparation is noticing. The moment in the week when you felt worst, or the thing you have not told anyone, or the sentence you keep almost saying to your partner. One of those is usually enough to open the hour.
What is the therapist doing while I talk?
Listening for what you feel as you say it, not only for the facts you are giving me. The content tells me your situation. How you are while you describe it tells me where the difficulty actually sits.
- Where you speed up, and where you go flat. Both tend to mark something, in opposite directions.
- What you apologise for. People often apologise for exactly the feeling that most needs room.
- What is missing from the account. A person who is clearly central and barely mentioned is worth coming back to.
- How it is to be in the room with me. Whether you relax a little, or stay braced, is part of the material rather than a distraction from it.
I am also going at a pace you can use. In a small Norwegian interview study where 12 therapist and client pairs reviewed recordings of their own early sessions, the pairs where the therapist moved into technique before a sense of safety had formed were the ones where clients withdrew or pushed back.1 It is a small qualitative study and it cannot tell you how often that happens, but it matches what I see. Early on, establishing that you can be yourself in the room matters more than getting somewhere.
How will I feel afterwards?
Often lighter and more exposed at the same time, which can be confusing if you were expecting only one of them.
Saying something out loud that you have carried privately brings relief. It also removes the protection that silence was giving you, and the afternoon afterwards can feel tender or oddly tiring. That is not a sign the session went badly. It is usually a sign that something real was touched rather than described.
Some people feel very little and worry about that too. A first hour can be taken up with orientation, and the feeling arrives in the days after it, or in the second session when the room is no longer unfamiliar. I would not read much into one hour in either direction.
How do I know whether to book a second session?
Ask whether you felt listened to rather than whether you felt better. The first is a reasonable thing to expect from one hour. The second is not, and judging the work by it will send you away from therapies that might have helped.
- Did anything surprise you as you said it? Hearing yourself say something you had not planned is a good early sign.
- Were you corrected or followed? Being gently followed into what you actually meant feels different from being explained to.
- Could you imagine telling this person the thing you did not tell them? Not having told it yet is normal. Being unable to picture ever telling it is worth noticing.
- Did the practical side feel clear and unhurried? How a therapist handles arrangements says something about how they will handle the rest.
Early sessions do seem to matter for what follows. In a large retrospective study of routine data from 14,951 clients in a blended care programme, those who rated the working relationship highly early on, and whose ratings improved, showed faster early reductions in anxiety and depression and more sustained improvement.2 The authors are clear that the design cannot establish cause, and it was a digital programme rather than a consulting room. It is a reason to take your early impressions seriously, not a reason to treat one hour as a verdict.
None of this settles everything. If your difficulty sits mainly between you and a partner, individual sessions may be the wrong shape and couples work the right one. If circumstances rather than feelings are the active pressure, a weekly hour will not move them by itself and the work has to take that seriously. And if you simply did not warm to the person, that is sufficient reason to try someone else without needing to justify it. If you are unsure which form fits, say so in the first conversation about psychotherapy in Copenhagen rather than deciding alone beforehand.
Questions people ask
Do I need to prepare anything before a first therapy session?
No, and a rehearsed account often gets in the way of what you actually came to say. If you want something to hold, bring the moment in the past week when you felt worst.
How long is a first session and what does it cover?
It is a full session, spent on what brought you now and on how we might work together, with a few minutes for practical arrangements. It is not an assessment you can fail.
Will I have to talk about my childhood in the first session?
Only if it is relevant to what you came with, and you decide when to go there. Most first sessions stay close to the present.
What if I cry, or what if I don’t feel anything?
Both happen often, and neither tells you whether the session was useful. A first hour can be taken up with simply getting your bearings.
Am I committing to anything by booking one session?
No, a first session is also how you find out whether you want to continue with this therapist. Deciding not to is a legitimate outcome of it.
If you are nervous about a first session, my page on psychotherapy in Copenhagen explains how I start and what you can expect.
You may also find these helpful
Sources
- Lavik KO, McAleavey AA, Kvendseth S, Moltu C. Relationship and alliance formation processes in psychotherapy: a dual-perspective qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022.
- A large-scale evaluation of therapeutic alliance and symptom trajectories of depression and anxiety in blended care therapy. PLOS ONE, 2024.
How this article was written: I choose the subject and the angle. An AI assistant researches and drafts. I read the draft, correct and improve it and stand behind every clinical statement. The professional and clinical judgement is mine.