At a glance
A long distance relationship holds up as well as any other, and the reunion is the part nobody plans. Distance keeps each of you visible mostly on good days, which makes the other person easier to love and harder to know. This article helps you prepare for the month when ordinary life comes back.
Clinical insights from 22 years in psychotherapy
I’m Mark Colclough, MA, psychotherapist in Copenhagen. Qualified at the Psychosynthesis Education Trust and the University of East London. 22 years of full-time, face-to-face clinical practice.
- The washing up comes first. When a couple arrives soon after closing the distance, the opening complaint is almost never about the relationship.
- Visits that were always wonderful. When every visit is described as wonderful and the separation as oddly comfortable, I listen for what the distance was doing for each of them.
- Guilt arrives before resentment. Where one partner has moved countries for the other, guilt gets in the way of plain speech long before resentment does.
Clinical notes: My observations are anonymised and compounded from my session notes since 2004.
Does a long distance relationship last?
Distance on its own does not end a relationship, and it does not protect one either. The 2 familiar verdicts, that distance kills love and that absence makes the heart grow fonder, both put the whole weight on the separation and leave the reunion unexamined. Couples living apart rate their relationships higher and feel more certain of them, and by follow-up they have separated at the same rate as couples in the same city1.
What strikes me is that the separation is rarely what people come to talk about. They come after it ends. Plenty of sound relationships have a year or 2 of distance in them, and living in different countries tells you nothing about how committed either of you is. What distance changes is how much each of you knows about the other.
Why is the reunion the hard part of a long distance relationship?
Because you gain each other and lose your own time in the same week, and only one of those was on the list of things you wanted. You spend a year wanting Sunday evening never to end. Then it never ends. What surfaces first is not gratitude but a small, unwelcome wish for an evening alone, then the odd self-consciousness of being watched while you make the coffee, and only afterwards the thought that something must be wrong with you for missing the distance.
That wish is no evidence against the relationship. It tells you accurately what the separation was giving you alongside the loneliness: your own pace, your own evenings, the freedom to work late without negotiating it first. About a third of these relationships end within 3 months of the reunion, and what partners describe is losing autonomy and novelty while conflict and jealousy rise2. Those were dating couples moving into the same place, so the figure says nothing about couples who stayed apart or who were already married.
Idealisation also runs higher at a distance than it does when partners live nearby, and higher still when the visits are far apart. Strong idealisation across long gaps went together with instability once the couple became geographically close3. Most couples plan the separation in fine detail, the flights, the calls, the shared calendar, and plan the first month of living together not at all.

Why does your partner seem different once you live together?
Because the distance let each of you hold a picture of the other assembled almost entirely from chosen days. You have not been living with your partner. You have been living with the best 3 days of each month of your partner, and they have been doing the same with you. Nobody is short tempered about the bins on a weekend that cost a flight.
So the first ordinary Tuesday reads as a change in the other person, when most of it is information arriving that you never had before. It lands as disappointment before it reaches you as a thought, which is why it feels like something lost rather than something learned. You are meeting a fuller version of them, and they are meeting the version of you who has a cold and a deadline. Read more about feeling disconnected from your partner.
What changes when one of you moves to Copenhagen for the other?
The one who moves gives up work, language and a city in the same month they most need a life of their own, so the load here does not sit evenly. Not every move costs all 3, and the ones that cost 2 are hard enough.
- Autonomy lost twice over. The loss of your own evenings lands harder on the side that also lost a city.
- Heard as a relationship problem. One of you has no life of their own here yet, and both of you hear that emptiness as something wrong between you.
- Guilt on one side. The partner who stayed put feels responsible for the whole arrangement and stops mentioning what the change cost them too.
- Silence on the other. The partner who moved decides that complaining is not allowed, having asked for this.
- Culture in the middle. Offices that empty before 5, friendships that take 2 winters to warm, a language that shuts you out of the lunch table: those explain a great deal about a first year in Copenhagen and nothing at all about either of your characters.
The honest reckoning is that one of you gained a home and the other gained a country they did not choose for its own sake. Saying that out loud, early and without apology on either side, does more for the first year than patience does. Read more about missing home after a move abroad and therapy in your second language.
How do you make the distance work, and the reunion after it?
You let the ordinary version of each of you be seen during the separation, and you agree the shape of the first month before the move.
- Set an end date where you can. A date you both believe in makes the distance easier to carry than an open horizon, and a date that quietly keeps moving does the opposite.
- Keep some of the contact dull. A flat 10 minutes about the shopping and the commute lets the unremarkable version of you be known.
- Visit on a working day. A weekend built entirely out of events teaches you little about living together.
- Keep your own life running. Whoever puts theirs on hold arrives at the reunion with a bill nobody agreed to.
- Agree your evenings. Decide roughly how many evenings each of you keeps alone, before either of you feels guilty for wanting one, and treat the number as a suggestion to adjust rather than a rule.
- Divide the flat before the boxes. Who does what, who pays what, whose name is on the lease.
- Decide about the first serious argument. Agree what each of you does when it happens in the same room, because at a distance you could always put the phone down.
Agreeing something in advance is easier than unpicking it afterwards. These steps are not enough when the end date keeps moving for reasons neither of you controls, when one of you is carrying the whole plan alone, or when the relationship turns out to work only at a distance. That last possibility stays genuinely uncertain at the point you first notice it, and it is better examined over a few sessions with somebody outside the relationship than settled in one difficult conversation.
Questions people ask
Is couples therapy better before the move or after it?
Before, in my experience, because what you agree in advance costs far less than what you renegotiate in a bad week. A handful of sessions in the weeks around the move is often enough, and that is a suggestion rather than a standard course.
Does online therapy work while the distance is still on?
Yes, and online sessions are how most of this work happens while partners live in different countries. Joining from 2 places is workable, and sitting in one room together is better once that becomes possible.
What happens in a first session about a long distance relationship?
Each of you describes the arrangement, what you are carrying and what the plan actually is, and I say plainly what I expect to be difficult. Nothing is decided in that hour, and the free 30-minute call is enough to work out whether to book at all.
Should I come alone if my partner will not join?
Yes, and individual work is often the better start when the weight falls on what the move has cost you rather than on what happens between the 2 of you. Plenty of people begin alone and their partner joins later.
How do I choose the right therapist for this?
Choose somebody who works with couples and who has sat with people living between countries, because the practical detail of a move carries most of the feeling. Ask how they handle a session where one partner is on a screen and the other is in the room.
If reunions keep going wrong, I can help you handle the comings and goings in expat couples therapy, in person or online.
You may also find these helpful
Sources
- Kelmer and colleagues, Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long-distance relationships, Family Process, 2013
- Stafford, Merolla and Castle, When long-distance dating partners become geographically close, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2006
- Stafford and Merolla, Idealization, reunions, and stability in long-distance dating relationships, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2007
How this article was written: I choose the subject and the angle. An AI assistant researches and drafts. I read the draft, correct and improve it and stand behind every clinical statement. The professional and clinical judgement is mine.