How do I grieve when home is so far away?

I flew home for the funeral, but I have been numb since.

Therapy with Mark will help you see what the grief has been waiting for.

Table of contents
TherapyCPH logo

See more TherapyCPH articles on Google.

At a glance

You know the person is dead, and some part of you has not yet believed it, because you were not there when it happened. Both of those are true at once, and the gap between them is where the grief gets stuck. This article is about closing it.

Clinical insights from 22 years in psychotherapy

I’m Mark Colclough, MA, psychotherapist in Copenhagen. Qualified at the Psychosynthesis Education Trust and the University of East London. 22 years of full-time, face-to-face clinical practice.

  • Distance delays grief, it does not dilute it. Clients who lost someone at home often tell me the feeling arrived months later, in a week when nothing much was happening.
  • The body holds out for a goodbye. Clients describe knowing the death and not quite believing it, and what is missing is an experience rather than more information.
  • Grief abroad goes quiet because explaining it is tiring. Clients stop mentioning the person once every mention needs a paragraph of background, and the mourning then happens entirely alone.

Clinical notes: My observations are anonymised and compounded from my session notes since 2004.

Why does it feel as though it has not quite happened?

Because you were told, rather than there. The death reached you as a phone call in a flat in Copenhagen, in the middle of an ordinary day, and then the day carried on around you. Nothing in the room you were standing in changed. Nothing here has changed since.

That leaves you holding 2 things that will not sit together. You know the facts, often in more detail than the people who were present, because you asked. And some part of you is still waiting for the evidence that would make it real. People describe reaching for the phone to ring them, not out of confusion, but because the habit has not been given any reason to stop.

What is missing is not information. It is the slow, physical business of a death: being in the house, seeing the body or deciding not to, the awful meals, the relatives you do not like, the hours of nothing. That is what convinces a person. You had a flight and a return date instead, and whatever you did get was compressed into 4 days.

Why was I fine, and now I am not?

The feeling waits until there is nothing practical left to do. While there are flights, messages, a family to hold together and work to tell, something in you stays organised. That organised state often lasts weeks past the funeral, and from the outside it looks like coping.

Then it arrives in a week when nothing is happening. A recipe. A phrase in your first language. The hour you used to ring them. People read this as going backwards, or as proof that something is wrong with them: composed at the graveside, undone in a supermarket 6 months later. In my experience it is the opposite of a relapse. The grief waited until you had the capacity, and then it came.

There is something else in the delay that is worth saying plainly. Distance let you keep the version of them that was alive on the phone, and that version does not die on the day they do. It dies slowly, over months, each time you notice a thing you would have told them.

Does it matter that I missed the funeral?

It matters, and it has not fixed your grief in place. This is the fear I hear most often from people who could not get home in time, and it deserves a straight answer rather than reassurance.

A review of 17 studies of funeral participation found the evidence inconclusive, with some studies reporting a benefit from taking part and others finding no measurable difference; what mattered more was whether the ritual felt meaningful and whether the mourner had any say in it.1 Those samples were small and narrow, so I would not build a rule on them. I would say this: the service is one occasion, and what it does is give the body somewhere to put the loss. The date and the venue are not what carries it.

So the question is not whether you failed to attend. It is whether you have done anything, anywhere, since, that your body registered as a goodbye. For most people I see, the honest answer is no, and that is the piece of work, not the missed flight.

Why is it lonelier here than the loss itself?

Because nobody around you knew the person, so every mention of them costs you an explanation. You say a name and have to supply a biography before the sentence can land. After a few attempts most people stop bothering, and the mourning moves inside, where it cannot be witnessed.

Meanwhile the relationship carries on in your phone. The messages are there, the voice notes are there, the account is still live. People find themselves rereading a thread at 1 in the morning, comforted and wretched at the same time, which is its own small version of the contradiction this whole article is about: you can reach everything about them except them.

There is often a second loss underneath the first. The person who died was part of what made home home. Losing them can quietly remove the reason for the yearly flight, or your defence of the life you built here, or the one relative who understood why you left. People rarely name that second loss out loud, because it sounds like making the death about themselves. It is not. It is part of what you are grieving.

What helps, and when is it not enough?

Treat the goodbye as something still to be done, rather than something you missed. These are the moves I see work most often.

  • Make the ritual you did not get. Choose a day, cook what they cooked, light something, read something out loud. Do it with the one or 2 people here who will take it seriously.
  • Ask for the details. Ask your family what the room was like, who spoke, what was said. Vagueness keeps a death abstract, and abstraction keeps grief stuck.
  • Decide about the phone deliberately. Keep the messages or archive them, but choose, rather than being ambushed every time you scroll.
  • Tell 2 people here who they were. Not the circumstances. Who they were. Grief needs a witness more than it needs sympathy.
  • Put the anniversary in the calendar. The weeks before it do more damage unannounced than marked.

These steps are not enough when the loss is tangled in a relationship that was never resolved, when the grief is braided into a decision you regret about leaving, or when months pass and you are functioning on a steadily narrowing life: less food, less sleep, less contact, more drink. That is not a failure of ritual. It is grief that has met something older, and it needs another person in the room while you look at it.

It is also the wrong moment to work on it alone if you cannot yet say out loud what you lost. Saying it to someone whose job is to stay with it is the work. If you would like to think about your own situation with me, a session or a free 30-minute call is the place for that.

Questions people ask

Can therapy help a loss I could not attend?

Yes, and the distance becomes part of the work rather than a complication to get past. Much of what we do is giving the death the reality it never got, so the feeling has something to attach to.

What happens in a first session about grief?

You tell me who died, what the relationship actually was, and what has happened in you since. I listen for where the mourning stopped, which is often one specific moment rather than a general sadness.

Does it count if we were not close?

Yes, and difficult relationships often produce the heaviest grief. Where there was unfinished business, the death closes the possibility of repair, and that loss needs its own attention.

Can this work online if I travel or have left Denmark?

Grief work holds up well online, and continuity matters more than the room. What I ask is that you take the session somewhere private, with the door shut.

Should I wait and see whether time sorts it out?

Time helps when grief has somewhere to go, and it does little when the feeling has no witness. If months have passed and you are managing the loss by keeping your life smaller, that is usually the point to bring it to someone.

Sources

  1. How do Funeral Practices Impact Bereaved Relatives’ Mental Health, Grief and Bereavement? A Mixed Methods Review. OMEGA, Journal of Death and Dying, 2022.

How this article was written: I choose the subject and the angle. An AI assistant researches and drafts. I read the draft, correct and improve it and stand behind every clinical statement. The professional and clinical judgement is mine.

Table of contents

Need support?

I’m Mark Colclough, MA, a psychotherapist and EFT couples therapist specialising in expats and international couples. If something here is close to what you are living with, a first conversation is free and there is no obligation.

Masterclasses for couples

Three sessions on one agreed focus, with a free onboarding call first.

TherapyCPH logo

See more TherapyCPH articles on Google.

You might also like

Picture of Mark Colclough

Mark Colclough

MA-qualified psychotherapist and couples therapist in central Copenhagen, practising since 2004. Advanced training in emotion-focused couples therapy and attachment theory. Works in English and Danish.

If any of this sounds familiar

You do not have to work it out on your own first. Bring it as it is, and we will look at it together.

Join the newsletter community

Join the newsletter and receive five practical tips for nurturing healthy relationships — with yourself and the people around you.

No spam. Just mindful insights.

Request a call

Please fill out this information and I’ll contact you soon. I use your details to reply to your enquiry, talk through practicalities and, if you wish, book a session. Please do not write sensitive information in the message field.

Clicking the button adds your email address to my mailing list. Please read the Privacy Policy for more information.

P.S. I’ll call you in a bit!